Mobile game publishing workflow banner showing user acquisition, creatives, monetization, analytics, and ROAS around a mobile game dashboard in a futuristic UI.

Mobile Game Publishing: The Growth Workflow We Use at CAS.AI

December 19, 2025 5 min read

Mobile game publishing is no longer a “nice-to-have” option for future growth. In practice, mobile game publishing has become a necessary step for scaling mobile games in a predictable way, entering Tier-1 geos, and building a stable business model.

Based on our experience, iOS projects can generate up to 35–40% of revenue from in-app purchases, while Android games usually reach 15–25%. At the same time, advertising remains the main revenue source for most mobile games. Mobile game publishing at CAS.AI is designed so that these revenue streams do not compete with each other, but reinforce one another.

What Mobile Game Publishing Means at CAS.AI

At CAS.AI, mobile game publishing is not only about user acquisition. It is a complete growth system, where every decision is driven by data.

We take responsibility for:

monetization and mediation with 14–20 active ad networks,
user acquisition with a transition from CPI to ROAS,
analytics at the geo, placement, and campaign levels,
ASO with regular A/B testing,
creative production and continuous testing.

The role of a mobile game publisher is not just to bring traffic, but to ensure that every acquired user pays back and can be scaled profitably.

If you want to see how we apply this in practice, explore our publishing overview here.

Minimum Requirements for Mobile Game Publishing

We do not require perfect metrics at the start, but there are baseline benchmarks without which scaling is not possible.

Retention and Engagement

For most casual and midcore games, we expect:

Day 1 retention (R1): 20–22% or higher,
Day 3 retention (R3): 10–12%,
Day 7 retention (R7): 5–7%, depending on the genre,
average session length of 5–8 minutes,
2.5–4 sessions per active user per day.

If metrics are below these levels, we focus on product improvements first, not scaling.

Monetization at the Early Stage

For successful mobile game publishing, monetization must already be implemented or easy to scale:

6–10 interstitial impressions per user per day,
8–12 rewarded video impressions per user per day,
no aggressive placements that harm retention,
baseline ad ARPDAU of $0.02–0.05 on Android and $0.05–0.08 on iOS.

These numbers are not a ceiling, but they show monetization potential.

Analytics as the Entry Point to Mobile Game Publishing

Every mobile game publishing project at CAS.AI starts with analytics. We build unit economics for each geo and channel, including:

CPI by country,
D0, D1, and D3 ROAS,
ARPDAU and LTV,
eCPM by format and geo,
session depth and return funnels.

Initial UA tests usually start with $100–300 per channel, which is enough to collect meaningful data for decisions.

For a real example of how we analyze and scale performance, see Publishing Case #4.

Monetization Within Mobile Game Publishing

Monetization at CAS.AI is based on a hybrid model:

bidding + waterfall,
different setups for Tier-1, Tier-2, and Tier-3 countries,
separate strategies for rewarded video and interstitials.

In practice, this leads to:

2–3x eCPM growth within the first 30–60 days,
1.5–2x increase in ad impressions per DAU without retention loss,
5–20x monthly revenue growth during scaling.

If you want another case that highlights a different growth path, check Publishing Case #2.

User Acquisition and Scaling Mobile Games

CAS.AI does not scale traffic blindly. For scaling mobile games, the process looks like this:

CPI campaigns to collect data,
retention and ROAS analysis by channel,
transition to ROAS campaigns after reaching D1 ROAS of 50–70%,
scaling only profitable geos.

In stable cases, this results in:

100k–300k installs per month,
creative CTR of 5–8%,
click-to-install conversion rate of 25–40%.

Creatives as a Growth Driver in Mobile Game Publishing

Creatives have a direct impact on scaling. At CAS.AI:

new hypotheses are tested every 3–5 days,
10–30 creatives are tested simultaneously,
video, static, and playable formats are used.

Strong creatives can reduce CPI by 20–40% and improve traffic quality, which immediately impacts ROAS.

For a broader view on how UA systems scale in mobile, you can also reference Google’s guidance on app growth and measurement here.

ASO and Mobile Game Publisher Strategy

ASO in mobile game publishing is not a one-time task. We regularly test:

app icons,
the first two screenshots,
localization for specific countries.

Improving store page conversion from 30% to 42–45% is equivalent to increasing the UA budget without additional spend.

For platform-level best practices, see Google Play’s developer documentation here.

Partnership Model with CAS.AI

CAS.AI works as a mobile game publisher under a partnership model:

existing revenue stays with the developer,
incremental growth generated through publishing is shared under an agreed model,
all analytics are fully transparent for the partner.

We focus on long-term growth, not short-term metric spikes.

Why Mobile Game Publishing Works

Based on our cases, mobile game publishing allows teams to:

increase project revenue by 10–50x,
enter Tier-1 geos with positive ROAS,
build a sustainable economy independent of organic traffic,
scale games systematically, not randomly.

Oleg Shlyamovich CEO & Co-Founder, CAS.AI

9+ years in mobile monetization. 500+ apps, 5B+ downloads.

Last updated: December 2025 View all articles →

Explore More

Technical isometric diagram for Flutter mobile ad mediation, illustrating efficient ad monetization infrastructure for cross-platform app developers.

AdTech & Monetization

Ad Mediation for Flutter

Maximizing revenue in the competitive mobile landscape requires more than just standard ad placements; it demands a strategic approach to monetization. For Flutter developers, ad mediation serves as the ultimate engine for growth. By implementing a robust mediation platform, you can force top-tier ad networks to compete for your inventory in real-time, significantly driving up your average eCPM. This guide explores the technical and strategic advantages of moving beyond single-network setups. You will learn the nuances of integrating industry-leading networks and the transformative power of programmatic bidding. Unlike traditional waterfalls, programmatic bidding ensures that every impression is sold to the highest bidder at the exact moment of the request, eliminating manual overhead and maximizing fill rates. Whether you are launching a new utility app or scaling a global gaming title, mastering these mediation techniques is the key to unlocking sustainable, scalable earnings and ensuring your Flutter project achieves its full financial potential.

July 8, 2025 5 min read

Abstract 3D digital technology platform block representing ILRD Impression Level Revenue Data for mobile game monetization.

AdTech & Monetization

ILRD Is Not a Setting. It’s the Foundation of Your Monetization Stack.

ILRD isn’t just a setting. It’s the base of your monetization stack. If you’re still looking at yesterday’s aggregate revenue and calling it “performance,” you’re flying blind. In modern user acquisition (UA), seeing $27,000 in daily revenue doesn’t tell you whether your campaigns are profitable, whether your ad frequency test is working, or whether your cheapest advertising channel is quietly hurting lifetime value (LTV). Impression-Level Revenue Data (ILRD), which measures revenue earned per individual ad impression, changes that. It connects every ad impression to a real user, specific device, and the original traffic source, turning return on ad spend (ROAS) optimization, analyzing groups of users over time (cohort analysis), and combining ads with in-app purchases (hybrid monetization) into measurable systems instead of relying on educated guesses. But IRLD isn’t just about turning it on. Waterfall floor math, bidding mechanics, alternative stores like RuStore, and Meta's platform restrictions can introduce discrepancies that quietly corrupt your signal and your UA decisions. In the full article, we break down what’s normal, what’s fixable, and what’s catastrophic. We also show you how to verify your IRLD before every build. If you’re using target Return on Ad Spend (tROAS) in 2026, this isn’t optional reading.

March 6, 2026 11 min read

Comparison graphic between Google AdMob and DT FairBid mobile advertising platforms.

AdTech & Monetization

AdMob vs DT FairBid

AdMob and DT FairBid solve monetization from opposite directions. AdMob is Google's closed ecosystem, a private auction backed by DV310 and Google Ads, known for global fill rates, banner strength, and reliable Net 21 payouts. DT FairBid takes the open-auction route, giving game publishers programmatic access to DSPs across the exchange, with standout eCPMs on rewarded video and interstitials at the cost of a steeper setup and Net 30–60 payment terms. The real question isn't which network is "better," it's which format and audience each one is built for. AdMob for banner-heavy, Tier-2/3 apps chasing simplicity. DT FairBid for gaming studios prioritizing fullscreen yield over fast cash flow. Or skip the either/or entirely: run both through a neutral mediation layer and let real competition set your eCPM instead of a single network's bias.

January 17, 2026 7 min read

Technical isometric diagram for Unity mobile ad mediation, illustrating the network infrastructure to maximize mobile game ad revenue.

AdTech & Monetization

What Is Ad Mediation for Unity Developers

For Unity developers, ad mediation is the essential technology layer that sits between your mobile game and dozens of global ad networks. Instead of relying on a single provider, mediation connects you to a vast marketplace, triggering real-time auctions for every impression. By polling multiple networks simultaneously, the system ensures the highest-paying ad is always served, significantly increasing your eCPM and fill rates. Modern platforms utilize programmatic bidding (or header bidding) alongside traditional waterfalls to create a competitive environment where 20 to 70+ networks bid for your inventory. For Unity creators, this eliminates single-network dependency and centralizes reporting into one dashboard. Whether you choose native solutions like Unity LevelPlay or high-performance independent options like CAS.AI, implementing a robust mediation strategy is the most effective way to automate growth and ensure you aren't leaving money on the table.

March 8, 2025 5 min read

Hybrid monetization in mobile games — shop, ad, and VIP pass buttons on a phone screen

AdTech & Monetization

Hybrid Monetization in Mobile Games: A Practical Guide

Hybrid monetization in mobile games done right: formats, safe ad frequency, and Ads/IAP balance that lift ARPDAU without hurting retention.

October 9, 2025 4 min read

A side-by-side comparison banner featuring the logos of Google AdMob and InMobi mobile ad networks.

AdTech & Monetization

AdMob vs InMobi

AdMob and InMobi solve different problems. AdMob leans on Google Ads demand to deliver strong eCPMs across the US, UK, Germany, and Australia, with easy Firebase integration and broad format support. InMobi runs independently, connecting to 150+ DSPs through its own RTB exchange, and it wins in India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Japan — often reversing AdMob's Tier-1 advantage in those markets. Payout timing differs too: AdMob runs net-21, while InMobi ranges from net-30 to net-60 depending on account tier. Neither network discloses exact revenue share, though third-party estimates put both around 30–40%. The takeaway: geography decides the winner, not brand reputation. Apps with mixed APAC and Western traffic get the most value from running both networks through independent mediation, where every impression is auctioned to the highest bidder rather than routed down a fixed waterfall.

January 16, 2026 9 min read

AdTech & Monetization

AdMob vs AppLovin MAX

AdMob and AppLovin MAX dominate mobile ad monetization for a reason. AdMob is Google's own network, fast to set up, backed by the world's largest pool of advertisers, and the default starting point for most apps. AppLovin MAX is the leading independent mediation platform, built for teams who want first-price auctions, granular floor controls, and maximum eCPM on full-screen formats. Both networks have muscle. Both have gaps. AdMob wins on simplicity and Google demand; AppLovin MAX wins on live bidding and full-screen eCPM, especially for rewarded video and interstitials in Tier-1 markets. But neither wins everywhere. If you want max revenue, don't pick sides; make them compete for every impression. Run both in a neutral mediation layer, and the highest bidder wins each auction, every time. Here's where each network wins, where they fall short, and what real data shows head-to-head.

January 10, 2026 7 min read

AdTech & Monetization

AdMob vs Appodeal

AdMob or Appodeal? Wrong question. AdMob gives you Google's massive advertiser pool and dead-simple setup, the safe default for most Android developers. Appodeal skips the single-network trap entirely, running 70+ demand sources through BidMachine's in-app bidding auction. Neither wins outright: AdMob's auction favors its own demand, and Appodeal's real fee rate stays undisclosed. Format matters too; AdMob's banners and App Open ads pull strong Tier-1 CPMs, while Appodeal's rewarded video and interstitials often edge ahead. Payout speed splits them further: AdMob pays Net 21, Appodeal Net 30-60. The real fix isn't picking a side. Drop both into an independent mediation layer and let Google demand and Appodeal's network compete for every single impression. Apps that switch to neutral mediation typically see ARPU jump by 1.5-2x compared to any single network. Test it risk-free: if revenue dips, the platform covers the gap.

January 15, 2026 8 min read

ASO 2026 strategies for mobile app discovery, organic growth, and app monetization.

AdTech & Monetization

Mobile App Monetization Under Siege: Maturing Algorithms Kill Organic Growth as User Acquisition Takes the Crown

ASO and paid user acquisition have merged into a single growth system as store algorithms focus on product quality, Apple expands ad placements, and organic-only strategies lose ground inside the competitive app economy of 2025. Mobile marketing entered 2025 at a crossroads. The rules that governed app growth for years - organic optimization here, paid acquisition there - no longer hold. Apple Search Ads rolled out new placements, user behavior shifted in unexpected ways, and competition intensified across every category. The result? ASO stopped being a standalone discipline practiced in isolation and became inseparable from the entire product and marketing funnel.

February 6, 2026 13 min read